CHAPTER III
RESEARCH
METHOD
A.
The
Research Design
This
research was conducted by applying classroom action research. Classroom action
research was applied because it focuses on individual or small group
professional practice and was undertaken in a school setting.
Ferrance
(2000) in http://www.lab.brown.edu
defines action research is a reflective process that allows for inquiry and
discussion as components of the “research.” Often, action research is a
collaborative activity among colleagues searching for solutions to everyday real
problems experienced in schools, or looking for ways to improve instruction and
increase student achievement. According to Kemmis & Mc. Taggart (2002:125),
action research is a form of collective, self-reflective inquiry that
participants in social situations undertake to improve the rationality and
justice of their own social or educational practices and to improve the
participants understanding of the practices and the situations which they carry
out these practices. It means that action research is a research designed in an
educational field which is conducted collaboratively searching for solutions to
real problems experienced in a classroom in order to improve teaching learning
quality and increase student achievement.
Therefore,
the researcher applied action research in this study to solve the students’
problem in writing recount text and to see the improvement of students’
achievement in writing recount text through peer review technique. The
researcher conducted the action research in two cycles by implementing the four
steps: planning, action, observation and reflection.
B.
The
Location and Time of Research
This
research had been conducted at SMA Negeri 21 Medan. It is located on Jl. Kramat
Indah Selambo, Medan. It was conducted at the first semester on October 4th
– 27th 2012.
C.
The
Subject of Research
The
subject of this research was the students class X-4 at SMA Negeri 21 Medan. This
class consisted of 40 students.
D.
The
Instrument of Collecting Data
In
this study, the data were collected by using quantitative and qualitative data.
The quantitative data were taken from students’ writing scores in order to
measure the students’ ability in writing.
The
qualitative data were gathered through observation sheet, diary notes, questionnaire
sheet, and interview, which are:
1. Observation
sheet was used to record the situation and discover problems found during
teaching learning process ran.
2. Questionnaire
sheet was conducted to know the students’ opinion in learning recount text
through peer review technique.
3. Diary
notes contained personal evaluation about the situation of the class while
teaching learning process and the progress of the project.
4. Interview
was done to know the students’ difficulties in writing, especially in writing
recount text and about peer review technique.
E.
The
Procedure of Data Collection
The
procedures of data collection were performed by administrating for seven
meetings and for two cycles. The first cycle was conducted in four meetings and
the second cycle was conducted in three meetings. There was an orientation test
before conducting the cycle I in order to get the background situation of the
teaching learning in the classroom and the information of students’ knowledge in
writing recount text. In conducting this research, there were four steps,
namely planning, action, observation, and reflection. Before the last meeting in
each cycle, the writer gave writing task to the students to be reviewed for the
next meeting (the last meeting of each cycle). The result of doing peer review
on students’ writing task in the last meeting of each cycle was used by the
writer as the students’ writing scores in order to see the improvement of the
students’ achievement in writing recount text. Cycle II was done if there is a
need to do it. The writer decided to do it based on the reflection in cycle I.
The procedure of
research could be seen on the following figure:
Figure
3.1: Action Research Model of Kemmis & Mc. Taggart
1.
Cycle
I
In
this cycle, there were four meetings were carried out. The first cycle was
conducted based on the problems that were found in orientation test. The study
began in this phase by interviewing the English teacher as the writer’s
collaborator related to students’ writing achievement and their problems in
writing a text.
a.
Planning
Planning refers to the arrangement for
doing something to solve problems. In this phase, everything needed was prepared
related to the action that should be done in teaching learning process. Some
preparations in planning phase were:
1)
Preparing lesson plan.
Each meeting was carried out for eighty minutes.
2)
Preparing all teaching
materials used in this cycle
3)
Preparing writing task
4)
Designing peer review
feedback sheet
5)
Preparing observation
sheet which was used to know the overall condition of the class during teaching
learning process
6)
Determining the
collaborator to analyze the weakness in teaching learning process and reflecting
the result.
b.
Action
Action
was the implementation of planning. This
cycle would be conducted in four meetings. The action was conducted flexibly to
see the possible changes happened because of situation and condition found on
the field. The activities in the cycle I could be seen as follows:
Table 3.1 Teacher’s and
Students’ Activities in Cycle I
Teacher’s
Activity
|
Students’ Activity
|
Pre Activity
|
|
·
Apperception: students are asked their
understanding about recount text such as what they have known or heard about
recount text
·
Giving motivation to the students;
making them sure writing is not difficult by means of peer review technique
·
Telling the students the objective of
the study
|
·
Answering the teacher’s questions
·
Listening and paying attention to the
teacher
·
Listening and paying attention to the
teacher
|
Main Activity
|
|
·
Explanning about recount text (the
definition, social function, generic structures, and language features)
·
Giving
recount texts to the students and asking them to identify the generic
structures and language features
·
Discussing the result of pair discussion
in identifying generic structures and language features of recount texts with
the students
·
Explaining about peer review technique
·
Giving instructions what should do in
peer review session, such as:
1.
Dividing students in pairs
2.
Exchanging paper (student’s writing)
with pair and read it silently
3.
Responding the paper in writing (giving
comments and revision on their pair’s writing by filling up peer review
feedback sheet each other during peer review session)
4.
Discussing the result
of peer review (student delves further by asking questions of their pair
reviewer)
5.
Re-writing the final
draft based on the revisions and comments given by their pair as needed
|
·
Listening and paying attention to
teacher’s explanation about recount text
·
Asking questions about teacher’s
explanation that have not been understood
·
Identifying generic structures and
language features of the texts given in pairs
·
Presenting the result of discussion
·
Listening and paying attention to
teacher’s explanation about peer review technique
·
Asking questions about teacher’s
explanation that have not been understood
·
Listening and paying attention to
teacher’s instructions and doing them, such as:
1.
Sitting with pair
2.
Exchanging paper with pair and read it
silently
3.
Responding the paper in writing (giving
comments and revision on pair’s writing by filling up peer review feedback
sheet during peer review session)
4.
Delving further by
asking questions of their pair reviewer
5.
Re-writing the final
draft based on the revisions and comments given by pair as needed
|
Post Activity
|
|
·
Asking
students to conclude the lesson that they have learnt
·
Giving
the students a task (writing a recout text individually to be reviewed for
the next meeting)
|
·
Stating the result of
the lesson they have learnt
·
Making
a note about the task given by the teacher
|
c.
Observation
The
observation was done while teaching learning process was running. The teacher
and the collaborator observed whether the activities of teaching and learning
had been applied due to the lesson plan or not. The collaborator also observed the
actions happened during teaching learning process, such as the students’
attitudes and responses. It was about the overall condition occured during
teaching learning process.
d.
Reflection
Reflection
is the feedback process from the action that had been done. It was very
necessary to help the writer to make decision what to do or to revise. Based on
the data, it focused to construct the second cycle.
2.
Cycle
II
Action
research is cyclical. After doing the cycle I, the researcher could decide to
continue the next cycle or not. Cycle II
would be done based on the reflection of the cycle I, there would be some
aspects that had to be improved.
a.
Planning
After
analyzing observation sheet and students’ writing score in cycle I, it was
needed to conduct cycle II in order to improve students’ achievement. Some
revised planed according to students’ need had to be arranged such as:
1) Preparing
teaching materials that would be used during the cycle
2) Designing
peer review feedback sheet
3) Giving
more motivation to the students in order to increase their enthusiasm in
writing during the writing process
4) Having
seen in first cycle that many students were not too serious during peer review
session, the writer would control and monitor every pair by asking them
everything they do not understand.
5) Preparing
research instrument, such as observation sheet and questionnaire sheet
6) Preparing
writing task to measure the result of the study
7) Determining
the collaborator to observe all the condition in teaching learning process and
reflecting the result
b.
Action
Action
was the implementation of revise plan of cycle I. This cycle would be conducted
in three meetings. The activities in cycle II could be seen as follows:
Table 3.2 Teacher’s and
Students’ Activities in Cycle II
Teacher’s Activity
|
Students’ Activity
|
Pre Activity
|
|
·
Apperception: asking
some students to share what they know about recount text
·
Giving motivation to
the students; making them sure that peer review is an interesting technique
and also an esssential part of writing process
·
Telling the students
the objective of the study
|
·
Answering the
teacher’s questions
·
Listening and paying
attention to the teacher
·
Listening to the
teacher
|
Main Activity
|
|
·
Explanning about recount text (generic
structures, and language features: simple past tense)
·
Giving a recount text and identifying
the generic structures and language features of the text together with the
students by asking one of students to read it first
·
Giving a task: an incomplete
recount text and asking the students to fill the blanks with the correct
simple Past Tense
·
Giving instructions what should do in
peer review session, such as:
1. Dividing
students in pairs
2. Exchanging
paper (student’s writing) with pair and read it silently
3. Responding
the paper in writing (giving comments and
revision on their pair’s writing by filling up peer review feedback sheet
each other during peer review session)
4. Discussing
the result of peer review (student delves further by asking questions of
their pair reviewer)
5. Re-writing
the final draft based on the revisions and comments given by their pair as
needed
|
·
Listening and paying
attention to teacher’s explanation
·
Asking questions
about teacher’s explanation that have not been understood
·
Reading the text and
Identifying the text given together with the teacher
·
Filling up the
incomplete recount text individually
·
Listening and paying attention to
teacher’s instructions and doing them, such as:
1. Sitting
with pair
2. Exchanging
paper with pair and read it silently
3. Responding
the paper in writing (giving comments and
revision on pair’s writing by filling up peer review feedback sheet during
peer review session)
4. Delving
further by asking questions of their pair reviewer
5. Re-writing
the final draft based on the revisions and comments given by pair as needed
|
Post Activity
|
|
·
Giving
questionnaire sheet to the students
·
Asking
the students to conclude the lesson that they have found
·
Evaluating
the whole activity
|
·
Filling up the
questionnaire sheet
·
Stating the result of
the lesson they have found
·
Listening and paying
attention to the teacher
|
c.
Observation
The
observation in this cycle is just same like in cycle I. The observation was done
while teaching learning process was running. The teacher and the collaborator
observed the improvement in this cycle whether teaching learning process was
better or not in this cycle. The collaborator observed the overall condition
using observation sheet.
d.
Reflection
Reflection
was the last step done by the teacher and the collaborator after all the
actions planned and the observation had done in this cycle. The teacher and her
collaborator would evaluate and analyze the result of gathering data in order
to know the surplus and the lacks of the application of the revised plan that
had been done.
F.
The
Scoring of Writing
To
know students’ ability in writing, there are some criteria that had been
considered. According to Hughey et al. (1983:141-145), there are five component
scales in scoring students’ writing, namely content, organization, vocabulary,
language use and mechanics (see Table 3.3)
Table 3.3 Scoring of
Writing Test
COMPONENTS
|
CRITERIA
|
SCORE
|
1.
Content
The
score of content depends on the students’ ability to write ideas, information
in the form of logical sentence.
|
Excellent
to Very Good:
Knowledgeable;
substantive; relevant to assigned topic
|
30
– 27
|
Good
to Average:
some
knowledge of subject; adequate range; limited development of topic; mostly
relevant to topic, but lacks detail
|
26
– 22
|
|
Fair
to Poor:
limited
knowledge of subject; little substance; inadequate development of topic
|
21
– 17
|
|
Very
Poor:
does
not show knowledge of subject; not
substantive; not pertinent or not enough to evaluate
|
16
- 13
|
|
2.
Organization
The score of
organization depends on the students’ ability to write correct and
appropriate manner for a particular purpose with a particular audience in
mind, together with ability to select, to organize and other relevant
information.
|
Excellent
to Very Good:
fluent
expression, ideas clearly stated/supported; succinct; well organized; logical
sequencing; cohesive
|
20
-18
|
Good
to Average:
Somewhat
choppy; loosely organized, but main ideas stand out; limited support; logical
but incomplete sequencing
|
17
– 14
|
|
Fair
to Poor:
Not
fluent; ideas confused or disconnected; lacks logical sequencing and
development
|
13
– 10
|
|
Very
Poor:
does
not communicate; no organization or not enough to evaluate
|
9
- 7
|
|
3.
Vocabulary
The score of
vocabulary depends on the students’ ability to write the word effectively and
to appropriate register.
|
Excellent
to Very Good:
sophisticated
range; effective word/idiom choice and usage; word form mastery; appropriate
register
|
20
– 18
|
Good
to Average:
adequate
range; occasional errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage but meaning not
obscured
|
17
– 14
|
|
Fair
to Poor:
limited
range; frequent errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage; meaning confused or obscure
|
13
– 10
|
|
Very
Poor:
essentially
translation; little knowledge of English vocabulary, idioms, word or not
enough to evaluate
|
9
– 7
|
|
4.
Language
Use
The score of language
use depends on the students’ ability to write correct and appropriate
sentences.
|
Excellent
to Very Good:
effective
complex construction; few errors of agreement, tense, number, word
order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions
|
25
– 22
|
Good
to Average:
effective
but simple constructions; minor problems in complex constructions; several
errors of agreement, tense, number, word order/function, articles, pronouns,
prepositions but meaning seldom obscured
|
21
– 18
|
|
Fair
to Poor:
major
problems in simple/complex constructions; frequent errors of negation,
agreement, tense, number, word order/function, articles, pronouns,
prepositions; meaning confused or obscured
|
17
– 11
|
|
Very
Poor:
virtually
no mastery of sentence construction rules; dominated by errors; does not
communicate or not enough to evaluate
|
10
– 5
|
|
5.
Mechanics
The score of
mechanics depends on the students’ ability to use correctly those conventions
peculiar to written language, e.g. punctuation, spelling.
|
Excellent
to Very Good:
demonstrates
mastery of conventions; few errors of
spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing
|
5
|
Good
to Average:
occasional
errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraph-ing, but meaning
not obscured
|
4
|
|
Fair
to Poor:
frequent
errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing; poor
handwriting; meaning confused or obscured
|
3
|
|
Very
Poor:
no
master of conventions; dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, paragraphing; handwriting illegibleor not enough to evaluate
|
2
|
G.
The
Technique of Data Analysis
This study used qualitative and
quantitative data. The qualitative data were used to describe the situation
during the teaching and learning process. The qualitative data in this study were
analyzed from observation sheet, diary notes, questionnaire sheet and interview.
Meanwhile, the quantitative data was collected and analyzed by computing the
scores of writing task.
To know the mean of the students’ score
in each cycle, the following formula was applied:
=
In which: = the mean of the score
= the total score
N = the number of the students
Next, to categorize the number of
students who are competent to write recount text, the following formula is applied:
=
In Which: P = the percentage of the students who are competent
R = the number of those
who get the score up to 70
T = the total number of the students